Comments on: “U is for Undertow” by Sue Grafton – a confusing mess

By: Genel amac?m?z ki?ileri bilgilendirmek ve tüm konular üzerinde durmakt?r. Hergün güncel konular üzerinde durulacakt?r. ?steklerinizi göz önünde bulundurulacakt?r.

Mon, 26 Dec 2011 00:56:35 +0000

Genel amac?m?z ki?ileri bilgilendirmek ve tüm konular üzerinde durmakt?r. Hergün güncel konular üzerinde durulacakt?r. ?steklerinizi göz önünde bulundurulacakt?r….

[...]“U is for Undertow” by Sue Grafton – a confusing mess | The Mystery Starts Here[...]…

By: Prestashop Templates

Prestashop Templates — Wed, 16 Nov 2011 05:11:33 +0000

Sites We Like…

[...]just below, are some totally unrelated sites to ours, however, they are definitely worth checking out[...]…

By: jody bennie

jody bennie — Sun, 30 Oct 2011 16:54:30 +0000

Very neat post. Much obliged.

By: gail nickolas

gail nickolas — Sun, 30 Oct 2011 16:54:06 +0000

Very neat post. Much obliged.

By: Henry

Henry — Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:23:01 +0000

I lately came upon your net net site and have been reading along. i assumed i might leave my terribly first comment. Nice blog. i will keep visiting this website very often.

By: carmen domenic

carmen domenic — Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:07:22 +0000

Nice site with good article information. Keep the good posts coming.

By: octavio gerard

octavio gerard — Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:06:28 +0000

Nice site with good article information. Keep the good posts coming.

By: derek jamison

derek jamison — Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:37:48 +0000

Nice site with good article information. Keep the good posts coming.

By: CARSON

CARSON — Fri, 07 Oct 2011 22:42:03 +0000

Whoa! I just found my name in the Twitter API =o

By: Emily

Emily — Mon, 21 Mar 2011 00:34:25 +0000

I have enjoyed all of the alphabet series, particularily “S” and “T,” so I was really looking forward to “U.” I was disappointed. It lacked much of what makes Kinsey so interesting, and much almost seemed to have been cut/pastde from previous books. I was glad to see some progress with her family, but that was lacking the emotion that typically accompanies the ties to her past. I didn’t feel like I understood what she was feeling at all.

Most frusterating of all was the ending! As others have noted here, the part about Micheal’s mixing up of the dates was really confusing. I think Betsy was right. But why would they feel the need to put a dog where the money had been? They could have just filled in the hole. I can see if they had moved the girl’s body they might have wanted to replace it with another cadaver to confuse dogs or explain hair and fiber or something, but even that doesn’t really make sense. And why didn’t they spend the money? I know it was mentioned a bunch of times that “everyone” had a blacklight in ‘67, so I am guessing they saw the marks, but that would have been a good flashback scene or something.

I am still looking forward to the rest of the series. They can’t all be winners, but I think this one could have been much better with just a few more paragraphs at the end.